Talk:Appalling TikToks Wiki

The rules
Regarding rule 4, the problem is not the mh:meta:Code of Conduct, which pertains to users interacting with other users. The problem is in mh:meta:Content Policy, where poorly or unsubstantiated claims regarding people and groups can result in unwanted attention, potential risk to the platform/other wikis and at its most severe, legal action. Also relevant is this section (quoted verbatum):

"Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people

Content on wikis must be fairly balanced, meaningful or substantiated by independent referencing. Wikis which have a clearly identifiable comedic or satire value are exempt from needing to substantiate claims as these provide a meaningful value in terms of relevant content."

This issue stems from the typical reception wiki page regarding a person having few to no sources, having weak, partisan or unrelated sourcing when they do have them and often approaching with a clearly biased and combative tone tone that also does not quite meet a reasonable definition of satire. "Code of Conduct" is only referenced as a misconception, and I take this opportunity to try and correct it here. While I'm opining on the rules, I'll further note that 5 is contradictory - you cannot tell people to avoid politics, then make an exception that calls for people to bash political or SJW commentary. A political and often inflammatory thing to do, though not necessarily a policy violation. Thank you for considering. --Raidarr (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)