User talk:SleepParalysisDemon

IMPORTANT: Please do not message me here. Instead, do it on Uncyclopedia.

There's some things I need to say
In addition to above, users should only be allowed if they are reasonably well-known (ex. 100,000 followers or more) because otherwise it is possible for them to find out about their page. However, despite my concerns with this wiki, I am interested in this topic and I do appreciate that you made this wiki (I had the idea of making it but I didn't really have enough ideas for pages). FatBurn0000 (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) First off, I think this wiki should be renamed for a couple of reasons:
 * 2) mh:abysmalhardware:Abysmal Hardware Wiki already exists, and therefore, the synonym "Abysmal" is already taken.
 * 3) This wiki refers to TikTok as Tik-Tok, even though the site is just called TikTok without the line in between "Tik" and "Tok".
 * 4) "Tik-Tok Videos" should be changed to "TikToks" because TikTok videos are called TikToks.
 * 5) I came across this wiki by discovering your wiki request for it, and I noticed that you said users are not allowed to avoid violations of the mh:meta:Code of Conduct. I will note that the Code of Conduct does not state anything related to not allowing users; CoC is about behaviour. The thing you are thinking of is the rule in the mh:meta:Content Policy that states "Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people". Having pages about users on this wiki does not necessarily violate this rule, and here is why:
 * 6) That rule states "sole purpose", so as long as this wiki's main focus isn't users, it should be fine.
 * 7) Making pages about users is not supposed to be "spreading unsubstantiated insult or hate", it is criticism. The reason why the URWs suffered from this is because they would often put users on their wikis and explain why they're bad people rather than criticising them for their content and possibly their personality as well (as the headers were often "Why He's/She's/They're [insert synonym for bad here]" rather than "Why His/Her/Their Videos/Posts Are [insert synonym for bad here]" or "Why He/She/They and His/Her/Their Videos/Posts Are [insert synonym for bad here]").
 * 8) Finally, as long as all claims are sourced, no one will be spreading unsubstantiated rumours.
 * I understand where you're going from there. To be fair though, I joined back in Spring of 2021, and am still learning about Past Qualitipedia. My apologies for the late reply. Recently, my attention has been slowly shifting towards the Uncyclopedia. I'm not saying I'm going to quit Miraheze yet, though I probably might sometime next year. Also, I'm 25 and currently working a 9-5 job, so I might quit anything related to MediaWiki software altogether. But not yet. If you want to become a moderator, message me here, though I might not get back to you soon because of the above reasons. SleepParalysisDemon (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, about that page you just created, that page is blatantly unsourced, so I think you should find some sources to prove your claims. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Something I'd like to mention
I've decided that the social media reception wikis shouldn't merge now, however, I do think that they need a lot of cleanup. Also, could we rename this wiki to Inferior TikToks Wiki? FatBurn0000 (talk) 22:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess TikToks would fit the title, but I don't know about "Inferior". The name sounds more comparable, like "inferior to X". How about Appaling TikToks Wiki? SleepParalysisDemon (talk) 21:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, I guess that's a good title as well. FatBurn0000 (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's spelt "Appalling" though. FatBurn0000 (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)